Creditor sought stay relief for violation of consent order, which was presented and entered just a few days before the creditor claimed a default that preceded the entry of the consent order.  The Court vacated the consent order, stating that “To present a consent order that purports to settle a dispute but is in fact a time bomb that will go shortly after it is entered based on acts or omissions that occurred prior to its entry is to undermine confidence in the use of consent orders to settle disputes.”
NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION