Movants sought stay relief alleging only that Debtor had another case pending within one year of the filing of the present case and that they were entitled to an order under section 362(c)(3)(A).  Motions denied.   The condition that no stay exists with respect to property of the debtor is not congruent with the condition that no stay exists with respect to property of the estate.  Argument that motions should be granted because Trustee did not oppose them was without merit.  The motions failed to allege facts that entitled them to the relief requested.
NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION