Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment with respect to its amended complaint for nondischargeability of a credit card debt under Section 523(a)(2).  Plaintiff’s amended complaint did not warrant an award of judgment in its favor because it did not plead sufficient facts to show that the presumption of nondischargeability under Section 523(a)(2)(c) for luxury goods applied.  Further, judgment was not warranted under Section 523(a)(2)(A) because Plaintiff did not plead sufficient facts showing intent to deceive or fraud by Defendant.
NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION