You are here

In Re: Smith v. Khalif, AP 03-9296, Doc. #11

A prepetition address mentioned in a debtor’s statement of financial affairs, even if valid postpetition, is not and cannot be “the address shown in the . . . statement of affairs” to which FRBP 7004(b)(9) refers.  A bare allegation that reliance was justifiable in a complaint seeking to declare a debt nondischargeable pursuant to section 523(a)(2)(A) is a conclusion of law and not admitted by a defendant’s failure to respond.

File: 
Date: 
04/26/2004